Radio Game

When my parents were dating in high school (they were way too young when they started dating, or so I've been told) they used to play something they called the Radio Game.  The concept is simple - you turn to a radio station, and the first person to (correctly) guess the artist gets a point (or ten points, or negative points for a bad guess... the point system is a little bit complicated, and the rules vary depending on... well, depending on just about anything you can think of).  I remember Mom and Dad continuing to play the Radio Game in the car when I was growing up.  Dene' and I thought it was a pretty huge waste of time, and they usually waited until we were otherwise occupied (a nap for Dene' and a book for me) before switching from the Christian radio station to oldies.

The advent of satellite TV and the plethora of music channels it provided was a major turning point in Radio Game history.  Now disputes could be settled quite easily (I have no idea what they did before) and commercials could no longer disrupt the game.

When I moved home for my final semester at UNL I was faced with a choice between spending my evenings upstairs doing homework (okay, who am I kidding - reading) or downstairs with my parents while they played the Radio Game.  Despite my love of solitary evenings with a book, it wasn't much of a choice.  Of course, I was at a significant disadvantage going up against a pair of opponents with ... well, a lot of combined experience :)

It's not much fun to play a game when you always lose, so naturally I decided I need to do some research.  I created a couple Pandora stations based off some of the standards (Moody Blues, Boston/Journey/Foreigner, Fleetwood Mac, James Taylor, Pink Floyd, America, Crosby Stills & Nash, etc.) and went to work.  Pretty soon I could hold my own.  I even won occasionally.  Moving to Colorado threw a bit of wrench in the system, but I have it on good authority that I still gain points at times even when absent (as I said, the point system is ... creative).

Missing my parents and this very special bonding quite naturally led to seeking other outlets.  I found one in writing new lyrics for some of the songs.  Below is my first attempt - a surprise for Alex on our second Valentine's Day:

to Bryan Adams' "Summer of '69" (it's a lot funnier if you have the song in your head for comparison - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9f06QZCVUHg)

I found my first real true love

Met him at an Irish pub

We became Facebook friends

It was the year of 2009

Me and some friends from school

We took Greek and we tried real hard

Derek quit the Davids got married

I wasn’t sure I’d ever get far

Oh when I look back now

That year seemed to last forever

And if I had the choice

Yeah – I’d always wanna be there

It led to the best days of my life

(CHORUS)

Ain’t no use in complainin’

When you got a job to do

Spent my evenings praying for a husband

And that’s when I met you

Sitting on your mama’s couch

You said that you’d love me forever

Oh and when you held my hand

I knew that it was now or never

These are the best days of my life

Yeah after the year 2009

Man we were lovin’ the time

We were young and restless

We needed to unwind

We know it will last forever, yeah

And now the times are changin’

Look at everything that’s come and gone

Every time I look at my true love

I know he fixes whatever is wrong

Sitting on your mama’s couch

You said that you’d love me forever

Oh and when you held my hand

I knew that it was now or never

These are the best days of my life


A couple weeks ago I got the inspiration for my second attempt.  Michael was hanging out with Uncle Matt who was making up lyric parodies to fit Michael's actions.  As usual, Michael started bouncing, leading Uncle Matt to sing out "Don't stop ba-bouncing."  Brilliant!  I couldn't resist carrying this line to its logical conclusion:

to Journey's "Don't Stop Believing" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5I-SbwCHJ80)


Just a small town boy
Livin' in Colorado
He had a midnight snack almost every night


Just a happy boy
Born and raised in a loving home
He had a midnight snack almost every night


What's he gonna do for fun
Spending all his time at home
For a smile he can bounce away
It goes on and on and on and on


Playthings waiting
Up and down they bounce and bounce
Their shadows bouncing all the time
Bouncing baby
Living just for time to bounce
And snacking through the night


Working hard to get his fill
Everybody wants a thrill
Givin' anything to bounce away just one more time


Sometimes up, sometimes down
Sometimes going all around
Oh the bouncing never ends
It goes on and on and on and on

Playthings waiting

Up and down they bounce and bounce

Their shadows bouncing all the time

Bouncing baby

Living just for time to bounce

And snacking through the night

Don't stop ba-bouncin'

Hold on to that feelin'

Bouncing baby

Don't stop ba-bouncin'

Hold on to that feelin'

Bouncing baby

Don't stop ba-bouncin'

Hold on to that feelin'

Bouncing baby

τι εμοι και σοι;

One of my students had a question about the meaning of the Greek phrase τι εμοι και σοι; (ti emoi kai soi), which is Jesus’s response to Mary at the wedding feast in Cana in John 2:4. This exchange between Jesus and Mary seems to be widely misunderstood, and I thought I would post my explanation here as well. 

The phrase can be literally translated as "What is this to me and to you?" or "What is this between you and me?" The RSV's "What have you to do with me?" is, in my opinion, very misleading and contributes to the common misinterpretation that Jesus is rebuking Mary for her request (as a new mother myself, I can just imagine what my response would be if Michael were to ever say "What have you to do with me?" - “What have I to do with you?! Oh, nothing much. Just nine months of carrying you in my womb, not to mention the last 10 days past your due date, and then 17 some hours of labor, and over four months of intense sleep deprivation… constantly being on hand to feed you, hold, you change you… THAT is what I have to do with you”!). The NAB's "How does your concern affect me?" is not much better in helping to shed light on this passage. 

There are several potential layers of meaning in this statement. The basic, literal sense is that this statement actually shows great deference on the part of Jesus. This same phase is used by demons when Jesus addresses them, showing their acknowledgement of his authority and their compliance (e.g., Lk 4:34, 8:28). 

It is also likely that it indicates some difference in understanding of the situation - Jesus may be using this question to indicate to his mother that they understand the significance of the wine differently. Mary sees the potential for embarrassment and dishonor for the couple due to the wine failing; Jesus sees the reality that Israel is waiting for the coming of the Messiah which is associated with an abundance of wine in several Old Testament passages (e.g., Amos 9:13, Joel 3:18). 

Another layer has to do with the second part of Jesus' response: "My hour has not yet come." In John's gospel the "hour" always refers to Jesus' passion and resurrection. Certainly John's placement of this miracle of water and wine at the beginning of Jesus' ministry parallels the miracle of the wine and blood at the end - and Jesus' statement may be a foreshadowing of the latter, indicating to his mother that it is not yet time for that greater miracle. At the same time he may be telling her that if he performs this miracle it will mark the beginning of his journey to that "hour." In this case Mary's response (which indicates full trust that he will perform the miracle) signals her willing participation in God's plan - the mother giving up her son to God's will.

The interpretation proposed by my student - "Why is this our business?" - fits as well. Of course Jesus knows that it is a very serious problem for the couple to run out of wine (much more serious than my husband and I running out of wedding cake at our reception) and he knows why his mother is bringing this to his attention. But we see throughout the gospels that Jesus often waits to be asked before performing a miracle. Of course the blind want to see - but Jesus asks "What do you want me to do for you?" before healing them (Matthew 20:29-34). This is an excellent interpretation of the moral sense of this passage - Jesus does not provide more wine until his mother intercedes for the couple. 

None of these are mutually exclusive, so all these layers can enrich our understanding of the passage (although they are hotly contested by many scholars - but then again, what isn't?). The one line of interpretation that is clearly wrong is the one which sees in Jesus' response to Mary either disrespect (a modern understanding of what he means when he calls her "woman") or an outright rebuke (which seems to follow from the English translation of the idiom). Clearly Jesus, being like us in all things but sin (cf. Heb 4:15), would have perfectly obeyed the commandment to honor his father and mother (Ex 20:12) – so any interpretation that involves disrespect is problematic. Furthermore, if Jesus were rebuking Mary she obviously missed the point – she ignores the so-called rebuke and tells the servants to listen to Jesus. Then Jesus apparently repents of his harsh response to his mother and does what she asked after all. Possible? Maybe. Plausible? Not so much. The story ends with Jesus and his mother leaving together – no mention is made of any tension or conflict (Jn 2:12). Other rebukes in John’s gospel are very clear, and they are never “resolved” with Jesus and the person he rebuked leaving the scene together. Thus it is clear that Jesus’ response to his mother is something other than a rebuke – however it may sound when translated into English.